Categories
Uncategorized

Blog Post – Module 1

 “WordPress!?! Aauggh!” – Our fellow historian Chris Nelson on Slack

To me, these two words, and emphatic punctuation, aptly capture my feelings towards using WordPress. But why? In the early aughts my best friend in high school and I shared a WordPress for typing class where we would practice keystrokes and create stories. Like an improv-group brought to blogging one of us would write a chapter then the other would write the next chapter, exchanging control of the blog and plot. At the time, I found the process of picking out a theme thrilling, publishing posts took on a giddy air, and the fact that someone could “discover” our little blog made us feel both nervous and excited. We left our WordPress behind within a year of graduating high school and both my friend and I migrated to Facebook (now that we had college emails addresses which were required at the time.) And so, WordPress faded from my mind until I took HIST 390 at George Mason University.

Here was where the “Aauggh!” sentiment kicked in. Over a decade later the tool seemed almost clunky compared to the fresh excitement it had offered in high school. Now picking out themes and posting and learning the ins and outs of the site management felt tedious. It wasn’t WordPress that had changed, rather the character of the internet and how I now approached it. In reading Adam Crymble’s book Technology and the Historian Transformations in the Digital Age I found evidence of how and why that change had taken place. In his chapter on the Rise and Fall of the Scholarly Blog he discusses a political blogger, Hossein Derkhshan, who was imprisoned for writing about the Iranian government. Upon his exit six years later he found the Internet to be a very different place: “the way people found content had changed dramatically” (Crymble, 151). Crymble locates this as being the result of “filtered algorithms” which are especially chosen for viewing by the popular social media sites (Crymble, 151). In more than decade that had passed between my interaction with WordPress my attention and appreciation for it as a tool had evaporated. I now felt that it was a borderline ineffective tool which required too much of my time to use.

Reading Crymble and his history of DH I found his call to action to investigate “structures of power on the Internet” to be a powerful one (Crymble, 151). Most importantly because I had gone from an active participant in my high school days, writing and posting, to a passive recipient who was merely consuming content. Much of Crymble’s text had a similar effect on me. I enjoyed his emphasis on getting the geneology of DH correct, that it was begat by at least two streams of thought (statistical and linguistic) and how historians work to incorporate digital media in the classroom and make their own classrooms to learn how to use digital tools effectively. I found his categorization of DH in “research, collection management, teaching, learning, and communicating” to be helpful in battening down this tricky term. (Crymble, 165).

Yet most helpful in cinching what DH is was our classroom discussion. In my group, Asha Isable, came up with a brilliant metaphor to help describe the qualities of DH. She likened it to a physician attempting to diagnose a syndrome by looking at various characteristics. Not every presentation of the syndrome will be exactly the same, but there was bound to be some overlap. For example, not every historian will be helping with collection management digitally, but they may create a project which is presented digitally – not the same, but still both digital historians! Our other group member Xaioyi Sun brought in her expertise as an Art Historian and discussed how online exhibits were now more accessible than ever before (a crucial feature in this time of COVID.) Finally, Kenzie Hool rightfully discussed some of the potential dangers of digital history with the advent of AI and misinformation. In sum, reading Crymble’s work was enlightening, but our class discussion between fellow historians was engaging and exciting. I feel more confident going into the digital world with these historians by my side.

8 replies on “Blog Post – Module 1”

Hi Jessica! I think your summary of the week is really great and touches on a lot of things that crossed my mind as well. I agree that Crymble’s categories of “research, collection management, teaching, learning, and communicating” were really helpful in my framing of how to define DH. I think your group’s inclusion of AI in your discussion is interesting too. I’ve read somewhere (couldn’t tell you where lol) that archivists are really wrestling with what to do with deep fakes nowadays. Some of them have decided to keep the real material as well as the deep fake edits of it because their existence speaks to the era of misinformation and political turmoil we’re living in. Cheery, I know haha See you next week!

Hi Jessica! I think your summary of the week is really great and touches on a lot of things that crossed my mind as well. I agree that Crymble’s categories of “research, collection management, teaching, learning, and communicating” were really helpful in my framing of how to define DH. I think your group’s inclusion of AI in your discussion is interesting too. I’ve read somewhere (couldn’t tell you where lol) that archivists are really wrestling with what to do with deep fakes nowadays. Some of them have decided to keep the real material as well as the deep fake edits of it because their existence speaks to the era of misinformation and political turmoil we’re living in. Cheery, I know haha See you next week!

Hey Jessica 🙂 First of all I love the way you started this blog post with Chris’s quote from Slack. When I first read yours it made me laugh and honestly got me excited to keep reading! I totally get where you’re coming from with the “Aauggh!” moment. It’s funny how something that once came with so much ease can feel so frustrating later on. I had a similar experience with WordPress this time round. I used design websites for companies after my undergraduate degree, and it has only been 3 years since I stopped and it already feels so foreign to me! The metaphor from your group discussion is spot on. Digital history is different for everyone, but with some common threads that tie it all together. Thanks for sharing your thoughts – your post really resonated with me! Lastly, I think your blog looks beautiful visually too, you seem to know what you’re doing, even if you feel like you don’t.

“It wasn’t WordPress that had changed, but rather the character of the internet and how I now approached it” – Jessica, I think you raised some critical points that I need to remember in this journey with digital history. We know that online and digital tools will be ever-changing, and I think it is important to remember that these changes are not solely driven by innovation, creativity, or audience needs but by as Crymble points out power structures behind the internet, which have their own intentions. Your discussion reminds me that we as scholars or creators as well as our audience are being steered and influenced by algorithms, AI, cookies, and other mechanisms, and how do we account for this in our work?
I also agree, I look forward to continuing team work overall in this class, putting diverse minds together to tackle these challenging ideas and questions.

“It wasn’t WordPress that had changed, but rather the character of the internet and how I now approached it” – Jessica, I think you raised some critical points that I need to remember in this journey with digital history. We know that online and digital tools will be ever-changing, and I think it is important to remember that these changes are not solely driven by innovation, creativity, or audience needs but by as Crymble points out power structures behind the internet, which have their own intentions. Your discussion reminds me that we as scholars or creators as well as our audience are being steered and influenced by algorithms, AI, cookies, and other mechanisms, and how do we account for this in our work?
I also agree, I look forward to continuing teamwork overall in this class, putting diverse minds together to tackle these challenging ideas and questions.

Hi Jess,

I really liked how honest you were with this set of sentences, “In more than decade that had passed between my interaction with WordPress my attention and appreciation for it as a tool had evaporated. I now felt that it was a borderline ineffective tool which required too much of my time to use…” because, though I haven’t used WordPress for as long as you have, I have used it before and completely abandoned it. I think one of the factors now and with the way we use technology is based on a sort of instant gratification, or well that’s what I feel when I post, or interact online if that makes sense. Especially if we on utilize these types of mediums in a controlled environment that expects feedback.
And for something as tedious and also very personal as writing blog posts can be I understand why it has almost ‘fallen off’ in a way.

I do think this line of thinking, however, made Crymble’s call to action even more impactful in my eyes. There is a need for something like this and it underlines the importance of digital history.

I look forward to continuing this uneasy journey through digital history alongside you!

Great analysis and summary of our discussion from class. I too am enjoying picking out themes and refining my blog. I will probably spend the entire semester just messing around with it. The idea of “filtered algorithms” is one of my main worries when look at digital archives. I think its also important to be aware as historians that what we are looking at is a filtered version of what is possible. This is where we need to look into the archives and their mission statements.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php